Towards Algorithmic Experience
Algorithms currently have direct implications in our democracies and societies, but they also define mostly all our daily activities as users, defining our decisions and promoting different behaviors. In this context, it is necessary to define and think about how to design the different implications that these algorithms have from a user centered perspective, particularly in social media platforms that have such relevance in our information sources and flow. Therefore, the current thesis provides an introduction to the concept of algorithmic experience, trying to study how to implement it for social media services in cellphone devices. Using a Research through Design methodology supported by interface analysis, document analysis and user design workshops, the present paper provides results grouped in five different areas: algorithmic profiling transparency, algorithmic profiling management, algorithmic awareness, algorithmic user-control and selective algorithmic remembering. These five areas provide a framework capable of promoting requirements and guide the evaluation of algorithmic experience in social media contexts.
Introduction. We are currently surrounded by algorithms (Willson, 2017). We appreciate how they ease our lives in many ways, deciding which the most efficient way to go is or selecting which are the most important news to follow. We also let them guide us: Diakopoulos express that Facebook‟s News Feed is the main government and politics source for 61% of millennials (2016, p. 56). In the same way, algorithms could be used as propaganda weapons to change peoples ́ believes and tendencies (Anderson & Horvath, 2017). It can be argued that algorithms govern our societies through shaping the interrelation between human and non-human actors. Introna (2015) explains how algorithms are not just sequences of instructions, but create relations and new meanings of the objects they work with in situated contexts (2015, p. 20). The nature of algorithms is part of the socio-material dynamics in our society, they are not only technical entities (2015, p. 23).
Discussion / Conclusion. Algorithmic experience constitutes a new way to analyze and describe design requirements in systems that possess algorithms in charge of profiling, trending and filtering information for the users, decisions that affect daily life and even societies. The current thesis suggests five areas to take into account for achieving a better user experience in Facebook‟s news feed in mobile devices, but they also could promote a more general solution for social media. First, algorithmic profiling transparency is an important aspect that provides the users the chance of noticing how the system is managing his or her behavior to provide a certain algorithmic results in any social media service. In any social media platform, profiling transparency allows the users to understand what the system knows about them, how it works and how the offered results are related to that profiling.
Lines of inquiry this paper opens 24
Research framings built by reading the notes related to this paper — the questions it feeds into.
How do AI-exposed occupations change in employment, wages, and skills?- Why do firms substitute labor for AI faster than gig worker jobs disappear?
- Can workers move across the divide between technical and non-technical job markets?
- How does AI task concentration within firms affect worker reallocation across jobs?
- Do firms with high AI exposure shed jobs or reshape roles?
- Which occupations show the sharpest gap between AI capability and actual adoption?
- How does concentrated AI exposure across workers affect firm-level employment demand?
- Can workers reallocate across occupations fast enough to offset AI displacement?
- How does AI skill demand vary across different occupations?
- What happens to wages when AI capability spreads across occupations?
- Why do some AI-affected occupations see earnings fall while others don't?
- How does occupational sorting respond to AI skill demand shifts?
- Does the gap in AI-exposed occupations reflect lower pay or fewer jobs?
- How do skills demanded in AI-exposed occupations differ from other sectors?
- How does concentration of AI exposure across job tasks affect worker reallocation?
- Do salaried workers get better AI training support than gig workers?
- Can workers retrain faster than AI exposure spreads through occupations?
- How does occupational segregation affect who gains from AI productivity?
- How do institutions shape whether AI enables worker mobility or deepens hierarchy?
- Does AI adoption rise or fall as worker education and wages increase?
- How do cheap and fallible AI systems affect labor market institutions?
- How long do negative earnings effects persist for displaced knowledge workers?
- Do low-ability workers gain more from AI adoption than high-ability ones?