Seemingly Conscious AI Risks

AI systems are increasingly designed in ways that lead users to perceive them as conscious. This paper provides a unified framework connecting empirical hallmarks of consciousness attribution to a structured risk taxonomy of Seemingly Conscious AI (SCAI), AI systems that exhibit hallmarks which elicit consciousness attribution from users. We survey the empirical literature to identify five such hallmarks of SCAI, spanning affective capacity, anthropomorphic features, autonomous action, self-reflective behavior, and social-interactive behavior. These provide observable, system-level proxies for this inherently subjective phenomenon, informing its design and enabling its empirical study. Drawing on this foundation, we develop a taxonomy of SCAI risks spanning risks to individuals, including emotional dependence and autonomy erosion, and societal-level harms, including human status erosion and political strife. We complement this conceptual analysis with an expert survey to assess the likelihood of each risk category. We find that risks to individuals, particularly emotional dependence and autonomy erosion, are already observable and rated as high probability, while societal risks, at a low probability, carry high potential severity and path-dependence. The single perceptual mechanism of consciousness attribution is shown to generate this heterogeneous risk surface. We then discuss the implications of these risks and map the multidisciplinary research gaps in this nascent field to inform its research agenda.