LinkedIn CEO says AI writing is not as popular as he expected it to be
Source: Mathures Paul, The Telegraph India (reporting Bloomberg) · 2025-06-22
Artificial intelligence tools have been, for the last two years, trying to suggest better ways to write an email, document or even resumes but LinkedIn CEO, Ryan Roslansky, has said in an interview that “it’s not as popular as I thought it would be”. In the Bloomberg interview, he was referring to the LinkedIn tool where AI can be asked to write a post from scratch.
“The barrier is higher,” he said posting about posting on LinkedIn and “getting called out” on the platform “impacts your ability to create economic opportunity for yourself”.
From LinkedIn to Gemini to Apple Intelligence, all the AI offerings have tools to improve writing. Most of the time, the text output is free of blemishes and has a feel of AI. Educators and even companies are constantly looking for tools to spot text that has been generated by AI. Further, AI models, like ChatGPT and Gemini, have the tendency to hallucinate, making the output unreliable.
Despite people not using AI tools to write posts on LinkedIn, “over the last year, there’s been a 6x increase in the skills required in any of those jobs being AI-related”.
Roslansky said: “My boss is Satya Nadella. Every time, before I send him an email, I hit the Copilot button to make sure that I sound Satya-smart. I definitely use it a lot in creating content.”
Lines of inquiry this paper opens 24
Research framings built by reading the notes related to this paper — the questions it feeds into.
How should human-AI contributions be measured, disclosed, and verified? How do AI hiring systems affect authenticity, fairness, and candidate preferences?- Why did excellent cover letters only come from strong candidates before?
- How do job posting trends in AI demand differ from what recruiters actually hire for?
- Do recruiters understand what their hiring algorithms actually prioritize?
- Do employers actually use Kaggle medals when making hiring decisions?
- How much do third-party recommendations actually improve employment outcomes for job seekers?
- What completion rates do AI hiring agents achieve on real recruitment tasks?
- How do recruiters and candidates actually want AI involved in hiring?
- Do job candidates prefer or want to be screened by AI systems?
- What hiring outcome data would prove AI screening improves hire quality?
- How do employers screen workers when cheap talk replaces costly signaling?
- Do recruiters and job seekers differ on AI's hiring role?
- How often does LinkedIn wrongly flag legitimate posts as AI-generated?
- How does LinkedIn's approach differ from other AI content moderation systems?
- How much of LinkedIn's feed is genuinely AI-generated versus human-written content?
- What triggers LinkedIn's detection of inauthentic content from heavy AI use?
- Why do AI posts collect likes without generating replies on social media?
- How does LinkedIn's platform response address detected AI-generated content?
- How does LinkedIn's comment-versus-post AI split compare to Reddit's?
- How does LinkedIn's verification system affect what content appears in feeds?
- Do members who flag AI posts actually see fewer AI-generated posts afterward?